tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7717405548205026477.post8298500314961529517..comments2023-11-05T04:11:45.663-05:00Comments on Why? What Have You Heard?: Thematic Photographic 77: "Buildings" v.6.0 - Department of DefenestratedMojohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03498213932233245032noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7717405548205026477.post-21493511230643115652009-12-03T14:11:20.682-05:002009-12-03T14:11:20.682-05:00The post title is hysterical!
Now, that's cre...The post title is hysterical!<br /><br />Now, that's creepy, just pondering what they might have in there!Maude Lynnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03669688074743095866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7717405548205026477.post-18285359572840614582009-12-01T19:35:52.938-05:002009-12-01T19:35:52.938-05:00I kind of like it. It has a '60s kinda groovy ...I kind of like it. It has a '60s kinda groovy post-art-deco-greco roman look to it. (deco-greco, I like it.)<br />In London, there is an insurance company building ( Formerly London Life) that has the original 1930's building, then has a new 60's building grafted on the other half. They are totally incongruous except for the fact they are both exceptional examples of their period.<br />Like most government edifices, the one in your photo dwarfs the populace and visually expouses the might of the State.<br />Please share some of Raleigh's uglier buildings with us.invisiblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17772375005034797148noreply@blogger.com