Showing posts with label open letters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label open letters. Show all posts

Monday, November 09, 2009

Open Letters: Dear Congressman Brad Miller (D, NC-13)

3 comments

I swap form letters with several of the legislators in my state, most often with Congressman Brad Miller and Senator Richard Burr. And Senator Burr will get his turn in the Open Letters column (probably several turns given his talent for pissing me off), but not today. Today I want to say thank you. All too often we ask someone to do something and they do it and we forget to say thank you. We don't mean to be rude, we just get too busy or maybe we don't notice or we think they won't notice. But when someone does something for you, maybe it's a Southern thang, but it seems like there ought to be at least an acknowledgment of it. Especially when that someone is an elected official. Because there are plenty of them that forget what they're elected to do -- represent us in Washington.

I'm sure there are some folks in my district that would say Congressman Miller doesn't represent them. But I'm not one of those folks, and I'd bet they're a minority -- a small minority based on the returns from the last election. Despite what the Congressman might think, I actually read those form letters I get from him. And since I'm writing a thank you note here, you can probably guess that way more often than not, he and I see the issue the same way. But on those rare occasions when we don't, I can tell that he's given due consideration to both sides of the question and reached an informed decision. And I actually trust that he knows things I don't about this legislation or that and that he's weighed the question carefully with -- and this is the important part -- the interests, wishes and welfare of his constituents as his primary guide in his decision process. I do not get this feeling from most politicians. And it gives me something that I think is far too rare in this day and age. It gives me a candidate I can vote for. For reasons other than he's "not the other guy".

Most recently Representative Miller voted in support of HR 3962 (Affordable Healthcare for America Act). This was something I had asked him to do (along with many of my fellow North Carolinians) and he did it. And I'm here today to say thank you to Congressman Miller, for having the fortitude to vote for the right of the working class stiff like me to opt out of "Big Insurance". I don't know if I'll actually do that, but this is a step toward me having the option.

But I'm not here to debate the merits of HR 3962 or whether or not universal health care is good, bad or indifferent. I think it's a good thing. You may disagree. That's your prerogative. I'm only writing this to let the Congressman know I appreciate his efforts on my behalf on Capitol Hill. Most recently in the vote on HR 3962, but for all the times that have come before and I neglected to say it...

Thank you Congressman Miller. And you can count on my vote next November, and beyond.


Stumble This!

Sunday, November 08, 2009

Open Letters: Dear Congressman John Carter (R, TX)

5 comments

Congressman John Carter of Texas' 31st District has me on his mailing list. I don't know why. I don't live in Texas, and to be brutally honest I can't think of a single issue that he's dropped in my in box that I agree with him on. That by itself is hardly unique. After all there are at least two legislators from North Carolina (where I do live) that can claim the same distinction. Normally I don't read Carter's blather because it only nauseates me to hear a guy lip sync to Dick Cheney and Karl Rove. But for some reason I read all of his diatribe against H.R. 3962 (Affordable Health Care for America Act). Apparently Congressman Carter called upon his constituents to call every member of congress and try to convince them to vote down the bill. Typical, and predictable. But I think it was his closing statement that caught my attention the most. And I quote:
"This debate isn't about healthcare," says Carter. "It is about seizing political power and control for the few at the expense of the many. Win or lose on this vote, Americans can now see why we have got to throw this Congress out in 2010."
Actually Congressman, this debate is about seizing political power from the few who have held the throats of the many under their boots for far too long. As for "throwing out this congress", that process began in 2006, continued in 2008 and if God is merciful, will continue in 2010. You and your power hungry "old boy network" are done. The American electorate has spoken in two consecutive elections. You have not listened. And as a consequence you will, God willing, find yourself out of a job by this time next year.

We have seen case after case of abuses of power by monolithic insurance giants. Cases of denials of coverage for some of the most preposterous of reasons. When a rape victim is denied coverage because she followed her doctor's orders and took a course of antiviral drugs as a preventive measure against possible HIV infection1 (which, it's worth noting, she did not have), this is an egregious breach of good faith. I challenge you Congressman, I challenge you or any member of Congress to defend this unconscionable action. I challenge you and your cronies on Capitol Hill to defend an insurance company that refuses to cover the cost of treatment for injuries sustained by a victim of domestic violence by having the gall to deem it a "pre-existing condition".2 Go ahead Congressman, I'm waiting.

Well?

Perhaps you'd like an easier question. I'll work on that for you.


1 For more of this story, check out
2 For more on this story, start with

Stumble This!